Screenie Test

[Deleted]

Just trying out posting screenshots. I don't have an FS screenie so I'll post something I do have and will take it down again tonight (these are a bit too big thus the reason for yanking them down so quickly).








Niagara-on-the-Lake, mouth of Niagara River at Lake Ontario, about 23 km downstream of Niagara Falls. May 11/2014

[olderndirt]

A beautiful spot - got some great marmalade from one of the many little stores.

[Deleted]

Yepper for sure! Crabtree & Evelyn (among others). Still there I think, although I wasn't downtown as much on this trip. That's Fort Niagara (NY) in the background, which I haven't been in yet. Maybe next weekend if the weather cooperates I'll get the sun coming up through the mist at the Falls. This time the blossoms weren't out yet so a trip back next week might be in order. It's only 2 hrs down to there.

[Sandy]

Beautiful images, Glenn.

Just wondering though... they are larger than board rules state (I'm showing them as 1280x1000 instead of 1024x600 <should be 1024x800 I believe>), but this new board utilizes a functional 'image auto-resizing' script. If you're viewing this in full-screen, make this a smaller window and scroll up to see the images again. Notice they're smaller, but not with scroll-bars? That's the resizing script at work.

I wonder then, if suggesting a max posted image size is even necessary? And also, I wonder if there's a forum admin setting to set the max displayed image size however Don wants, despite whatever image size is posted/linked-to? Things to think about in the future after the dust from the move settles.

[Deleted]

Thanks Sandy. Yeah, they are 1280 x 1000. I'm not sure how the resizing works to be honest. I'll let Don take care of the details like that, but normally I still will try to stick to the requested max size just in case. I actually meant to take them down last night but we had a round of thunderstorms go through so I didn't turn the computer on. Anyway, these aren't good enough to submit to the agency I work with but if they were, I definitely would have got them down sooner (nothing worse than having the agency sell a license to a client only for the same image to show up elsewhere because someone downloaded it and are distributing it themselves - hey, it's happened ). They'll be down tonight at any rate.

[Bushpounder]

I don't see a way to tamper with those settings. I'd say we just do it in the old honor sytem way. Most people view their screens in full-screen mode. If someone posted 25 pictures at a bigger size, it may take some time to load all to look at. That's why I posted that size. It is not a bad load time. You can leave these on here. As I poke around, maybe there is a way to find a fix for the resize. I'll keep hunting, but I'm not seeing anything yet.

BP;)

[Deleted]

OK, I did take them down. For other reasons I don't like leaving these up too long anyway.

[Sandy]

Not a problem, just neat that the resize code is working in case a larger than expected image link sneaks by.